—
no calls resolved yet
0 scored
single source
3
companies · 26 data points
I think Auto has a pretty aggressive launch strategy and I think they'll do well you know I'm happy they're not in the same segment is US yeah they're winners they're winners
Nvidia you know just just like they realize that their gpus are a lot more than gaming right um and gaming has a lot of the same problems I mean computer Graphics is has a lot of the same problems as computer vision right um so it makes sense that the things that we're designed to do computer Graphics which is you know process a lot of pixels right so go from something to a lot of pixels go from some code Bas to draw you know Quake or Doom or some really high rendered Call of Duty game going up
I'm a big Nvidia fan uh you know the CEO of Nvidia has been in my car yeah um they they've been you know we've been we've talking with them um you know really really a company that gets where the future is going
I think Auto has a pretty aggressive launch strategy and I think they'll do well you know I'm happy they're not in the same segment is US yeah they're winners they're winners
Trucking Auto I like Auto I like Auto you know I don't I don't speak highly of too many companies in the space Auto is a bunch of EX Google guys um who got fed up with the fact that Google didn't ship
V Tov what does it mean a v2v is vehicle to vehicle oh we're going to the vehicles are going to are going to organize in a daisy chain and they're going to micropay each other with Bitcoin to save the fuel cost from come on losers losers absolute losers who say things like that
Google I think Google has about $150,000 worth of sensors on a car
Google's car is is is fairly dumb uh the way it works it pretty much says okay I've been exactly here before I went exactly this way let me continue to go exactly that way
our system is capable of doing that no other system shipping today can including Google's
Google builds a system that drives based on a set of rules... this is why the Google car has been rear ended so many times because technically it may be following the rules of the road but the average human driver is not
Auto is a bunch of EX Google guys um who got fed up with the fact that Google didn't ship
Google does not just have an expensive lar system they also have a very expensive GPS system got it um so yeah I mean Google's car is is is fairly dumb uh the way it works it pretty much says okay I've been exactly here before I went exactly this way let me continue to go exactly that way
Google I think Google has about $150,000 worth of sensors on a car
Google has light City but if you notice Google is driving in Mountain viw not San Francisco Mountain View is significantly easier than San Francisco
Google builds a system that drives based on a set of rules um you have like set of rules on how to drive Engineers think about how to drive I mean this is why the Google car has been rear ended so many times because technically it may be following the rules of the road but the average human driver is not
I think Auto has a pretty aggressive launch strategy and I think they'll do well you know I'm happy they're not in the same segment is US yeah they're winners they're winners
Auto is a bunch of EX Google guys um who got fed up with the fact that Google didn't ship so there's a few things that are very different in trucking one 100 $50,000 in sensors is okay um the majority cost in trucking is the drivers um not true in in like airplanes you look at the cost of the pilot versus the cost of the fuel pilot are cheap um but the majority of cost of trucking is drivers so you can afford something like an $150,000 system that you put on your truck for sure especially if the
the mobile I misclassified the truck is more Road like you know come on whereas your system with the camera would not have done that well the mobile has a camera too but we have much more sophisticated processing software
I think that cameras and better processing is the future um in some ways if you buy good cameras today those are totally good enough to drive a car really well
I've never seen one liar never mind a cheap the only lar I've seen for them from them is significantly worse and more expensive than the valine lar right they're promising this $250 solid state liar I just haven't seen it um from what I've heard they have like serious range issues like it can only see 20 MERS well that's useless
the Tesla has limited ultra sound around it and then a forward facing radar and a non-color camera um will be a forward facing radar and a color camera right so the in in thata in that way the systems are somewhat similar in design
the Tesla Lane change is dangerous I would not have shipped the Tesla Lane change if I was if I was a Tesla because so it has ultrasonic sensors on the side ultrasonic sensors are very short range so if you're going 70 M hour you turn on the automatic Lane change to turn into to go into the left lane but there's a car 30 m back going 90 you're in trouble right right like that's a really bad move to make
this was not an edge case
Tesla's system and our system is not a self driving system right now
Tesla Model S is an incredibly safe car
these Radars have onboard processing that is not very good... you have to filter out stationary objects
the camera on the Tesla the camera that mobile ey recommends is not a color camera... the white truck and the blue sky looked identical