fresh
No person- or entity-level identity check is on record for this company. A name match is not one.
The inclusion bar: two or more independent sourced evidence families. This profile is reachable but not in the ranked index. It is a statement about how much evidence we hold, and about nothing else.
We have not established fit. That is not a soft no and not a soft yes — it is unknown, and it is never counted as a qualified prospect.
↗ Strongest signal: funding_recency (18% of the score).
↓ Scored on 1 of 4 components — funding_magnitude, adoption, developer had no computable metric.
No single number decides. Layers can disagree — that's the point. New to this? →
VentureSignalScore 68.9/100 for zaps-worldwide, composed from 1 of 4 components (index v0 cross-signal), discounted ×0.76 for 20% signal coverage
| Component | Weight | Normalized | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| funding_recency | 0.2 | 0.9067 |
sec.form_d.first_sale 2026-10-11 review The company has Form D filings on record that our reported-funding data does not cover. That is a gap in OUR funding data and not evidence that the raise went unreported — trade press reads EDGAR too, and two of the three companies in our first Form D batch were published by a funding newsletter on the day they filed, from the same documents. What the filing establishes is listed below; the stage of the round, and whether it is news, are not established by it.
Form D filings — the company's own authoritative record of a Reg D private raise, filed with the SEC. Primary-source evidence: not commentary, not inference. 1 filing, latest filed 2026-10-01. A Form D is filed after the sale, so the filing date is when the notice reached the SEC — not when the round closed. Where the issuer stated a first-sale date it is shown beside it, and a D/A amends an earlier offering rather than reporting a new one.
A first sale, a filing, an amendment and a public announcement are not the same event, and one date may not stand in for another. Where the latest financing date cannot be established from what we hold, this says unknown rather than substituting a date we do have.
The issuer's own first-sale date on its D is 2026-09-08: the FIRST dollar of this offering. The filing does not date the last one, so money moved on or after 2026-09-08 and the reported total had been reached by 2026-10-01.
| Attribute | Value | Kind | Source | Observed | State | Conf. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
common_name | Zaps Worldwide, Inc. | observed | review | 2026-10-11 | normalized | 0.70 |
metric.venture.funding_recency_days | 33.2411 | derived | calc | 2026-10-11 | superseded | 0.70 |
metric.venture.funding_recency_days | 34.0402 | derived | calc | 2026-10-12 | derived | 0.70 |
platform.visibility | draft | observed | review | 2026-10-11 | normalized | 0.70 |
score.venture_signal | 69.1 | derived | calc | 2026-10-11 | superseded | 0.30 |
score.venture_signal | 68.9 | derived | calc | 2026-10-12 | derived | 0.30 |
sec.form_d.count | 1 | observed | review | 2026-10-11 | normalized | 0.70 |
sec.form_d.filings | [{"form": "D", "filed": "2026-10-01", "amends": null, "location": "PHOENIX, AZ", "accession": "0002157757-26-000001", "index_url": "review:01M4MQDWNV0F1V1PM7T0BH8EQ2", "first_sale": "2026-09-08", "ind | observed | review | 2026-10-11 | normalized | 0.70 |
sec.form_d.first_sale | 2026-09-08 | observed | review | 2026-10-11 | normalized | 0.70 |
sec.form_d.latest_filed | 2026-10-01 | observed | review | 2026-10-11 | normalized | 0.70 |