Sky Analytica Corp

What we have established three decisions, kept apart

1. 1 Identity verified Yes

   A dba bridge proven from a page the company controls, plus a person-level match. skyra.ai and "Sky Analytica Corporation" share no words, so the brand page alone was not accepted.

   • skyra.ai/terms declares "Skyra is a DBA of Sky Analytica Corporation, a Delaware C-Corp"
   • Filing jurisdictionOfInc DELAWARE matches that declaration
   • Form D director Bryan Wolfe is the co-founder in the public record; CEO Mickel Mirchandani signed the filing
   • Filing yearOfInc 2023 matches the founding year
2. 2 Evidence sufficient to publish Not yet

   The inclusion bar: two or more independent sourced evidence families. This profile is reachable but not in the ranked index. It is a statement about how much evidence we hold, and about nothing else.

3. 3 Fit for a seed/Series-A sourcing buyer Not established

   We have not established fit. That is not a soft no and not a soft yes — it is unknown, and it is never counted as a qualified prospect.

   Neither leg is established, and the reason is that we found nothing rather than that nothing exists. Searching both the brand (Skyra / skyra.ai) and the legal entity (Sky Analytica Corporation) returned no funding record, no investor and no stage — only name collisions (a Norwegian Skyra AS, a SkyAI token project, the acquired Sky Analytics). "No coverage found" is weaker evidence than "coverage found", so this stays unknown and is not read as a negative.

   Venture backing: unknown · Stage band: not established by any source

   • skyra.ai ↗ — The company’s own dba declaration, which is what ties the filer to the product. The load-bearing source for this profile.
   • skyra.ai ↗ — The operating product and its own description of the business.

   What the filing alone says

   A Delaware issuer filed a Reg D offering, first sale 2026-09-28, filed 2026-10-08, naming Mickel Mirchandani as signatory and Bryan Wolfe as a director, yearOfInc 2023. The filer name "Sky Analytica Corporation" matches no product a buyer could look up.

   What we add

   The one thing a buyer cannot get from the filing: the operating business. "Sky Analytica Corporation" is skyra.ai, proven from the company’s OWN terms page — "Skyra is a DBA of Sky Analytica Corporation, a Delaware C-Corp" — not from a name match, which would have failed outright here. That is this profile’s entire value and it is real work.

   Still unknown

   • Any investor, any stage, any funding history, under either name.
   • Whether the company has hiring or developer presence anywhere sourceable — we found no careers page, no GitHub organisation and no published package.
   • Whether the lack of coverage means it is early or simply small.

   Action it supports

   A first-contact call: we can tell a buyer who to call and what the company does, which the filing alone cannot. We cannot tell them whether it is venture-stage.

   Our arrival vs public

   NO ADVANTAGE DEMONSTRATED, and "unknown" was a dodge (Hermes, 2026-10-11). The issuer declares first sale 2026-09-28; the filing reached EDGAR 2026-10-08 and we decided on 2026-10-08. So the company had been selling securities for 10 days before the document we read existed, and we arrived with it — at the same moment as any other reader of the EDGAR feed. No public report was found, which is not evidence we were first.

   Research time

   not tracked

   Unresolved

   • Is there any investor record at all, under either the brand or the legal name?
   • Does the company have hiring or developer presence anywhere we can source?

   What would overturn this: Any sourced investor or stage record under either name.

   Assessed 2026-10-11 for seed/Series-A sourcing.